Seven Wins, Still Red: Why Win Rate Lies#
You won 7 trades and lost only 3. And your account is still down. Here is why, and what to do about it.
1. Count rupees, not green rows#
Win rate alone tells you nothing. What matters is how much you make when you win versus how much you lose when you lose.
| Trades | Per trade | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wins | 7 | +โน500 | +โน3,500 |
| Losses | 3 | โโน1,500 | โโน4,500 |
| Net (before costs) | 10 | โโน1,000 |
A 70% win rate, and still a loss of about โน100 per trade, before brokerage and taxes.
2. The quick formula: expectancy#
Expectancy per trade = (Win rate ร Avg win) โ (Loss rate ร Avg loss) โ Costs = (0.7 ร 500) โ (0.3 ร 1500) โ costs = 350 โ 450 โ costs = โ100 โ costs
If this number is negative, more trades only means more losses.
3. The tempting fix: "I'll just make my stop loss smaller"#
It sounds like simple maths: halve the loss, keep the wins. But it does not work that way.
- A tighter stop gets hit more often. Some of those 7 winners dipped before they worked; now they become losers.
- Gaps and slippage can make real losses bigger than the stop you planned.
- So you have not just changed the loss size. You have changed the strategy.
4. What to do instead#
- Log four numbers together for every strategy: win rate, average realised win, average realised loss, and costs (brokerage, taxes, charges).
- Change one rule at a time. Stop, target, entry: any change makes a new strategy.
- Retest the whole thing on past data before trading it live. Don't just edit the losing column.
- Don't trust 10 trades. A small sample is not proof of an edge. Look at many trades across different market conditions.
5. Backtest it properly#
TradingLead lets you chart, replay and backtest your strategy on real Indian market data, so you can see the real expectancy before risking money.
๐ Try it free: tradinglead.in
Educational content only. The numbers above are a fictional example, not investment advice. Trading involves risk, including loss of capital.